now reading issue:

  read

discuss

calendar

search

pdfs

about us

join us

subscribe

utd home

November 2009 / vol. 6 issue 3

Wait a minute. Consumption, flux, and the grip? What a deal!
Wait a minute. Consumption, flux, and the grip? What a deal!
Illustration by lewis chang

Homeopathology

Water, water everywhere, and none of it is medicine

Just over 7 years ago, Thomas and Manju Sam, an Australian couple with a newborn daughter suffering from a severe case of eczema, made the fateful decision to discontinue her medical treatment and put her on a program of homeopathic “remedies”. Gloria, their daughter, spent the final two weeks of her short life in ceaseless, shrieking agony as the skin slowly peeled off her body. Two months ago, in an Australian court, the couple was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to ten years in prison.

We can look at that case and decry the parents’ terrible neglect, place the blame squarely on their shoulders, and feel a sense of righteous justice at their sentence. Our anger at them would not be misplaced. But we shouldn’t confine our fury to the Sams alone. What killed Gloria was a combination of ignorance and a culture of quackery, so-called “alternative medicine”, which has steadily gained exposure and acceptance, despite the complete lack of evidence that the so-called “medicine” is anything more than wishful thinking.

Homeopathy kills people. It is not some harmless superstition or some zany new-age fad that rich people use on their pets. It is a massive, systemic attempt to undermine legitimate science, and the consequences of allowing it to go unchallenged are lethal.

In case you’re unfamiliar with the term, homeopathy is a belief first expounded in the early 19th century by Samuel Hahnemann, who observed (incorrectly) that cinchona bark, a cure for malaria, created malarial symptoms when given to non-malarial patients. He had practically no methodology, and even by the lax standards of the day his conclusions could hardly be considered scientific.

However, his observations led him to the conclusion that “like cures like” — that is, to cure an illness, give the patient something that presents similar pathologies.

If curing poison with poison sounds crazy to you, you’re not alone. It even sounded crazy to Hahnemann, which is why he expanded his theory. You don’t just treat arsenic with arsenic — that would kill someone. Instead you must first dilute the arsenic treatment in water, and the more diluted the treatment, the more effective it becomes.

That’s really it. Homeopaths believe that putting poison in water and rendering it so dilute that it no longer contains anything but water cures illness. It’s one of the craziest, most unscientific quack treatments ever devised. It’s like selling snake oil without having the decency to squeeze a good snake. Water. That’s it. Water will cure whatever ails you — according to homeopaths.

That in itself wouldn’t be so awful, except homeopaths also believe that in order for their “alternative treatments” to work, people must discontinue standard medical treatment. If you have strep throat, you mustn’t take antibiotics. Instead, just drink some water with boric acid in it. That’s why homeopathic “medicine” is so insidious. While drinking magic water is pretty harmless, drinking magic water at the exclusion of real medicine is dangerous.

Homeopathy is crazy, not even remotely scientific, and not really medicine, but there are fringe elements everywhere — so what? You should care because all over the Western world homeopathy is given special treatment, as though it were a scientific approach to curing disease.
Abroad and at home, people such as Senator Tom Harkin are actively working to force doctors and government research institutions to treat homeopathy as a valid alternative to medicine.

Years ago, Harkin began a campaign to undermine real science: he forced the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to create an Office of Alternative Medicine (OAM). The goal of that office was to study the efficacy of so-called alternative treatments. After several years, the OAM found no evidence that homeopathy can treat any known disease and in fact proved that it does nothing. Fearing that his beloved center for quackery would be shut down, Harkin elevated the Office to its own independent center within the NIH, the NCCAM (National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Harkin, and people like him, have worked tirelessly to create a culture of acceptance and “open-mindedness” regarding alternative “medicine”. They want you to think of traditional (that is to say, effective) medicine as bound by prejudice, as set in its ways. Alternative theories, he would have you believe, are new and bold and should be given encouragement.

For proof of what happens when we treat homeopathy as medicine, look no further than Zicam, an “over-the-counter cold remedy.” Zicam is just water with zinc diluted in it, and while it won’t cure a cold, it should at least have been pretty harmless.

Because of the efforts of people like Harkin, homeopathic “medicines” like Zicam aren’t regulated by the FDA. Since it had no regulation, some batches of Zicam were shipped that were not just ineffective — they actually caused hundreds of people to lose their sense of smell permanently.

Homeopathy is dangerous, and should be treated as such. It deserves no protection. Homeopaths aren’t daring medical practitioners willing to take bold risks. They are charlatans preying on the gullible.

Because of homeopathy, a newborn girl, oozing pus from every surface of her tiny body, screamed herself to death in unending pain. The only thing homeopaths dilute in their magical water is the efficacy of science and the value of human life. 

now reading:  
  in November 2009 issue

Story Comments

  1. (6 Nov '09) your mother says,
    Ah, the righteous indignation of youth is so adorable! Superb job of trashing the last few millenia of medicine, and more than a few current cultures to boot. Ever considered the possibility of science and nature working in tandem, Richard?
  2. (8 Nov '09) nt says,
    You can keep "the last few millenia of medicine." I'm really only interested in the last 150 years or so, during which we learned what ACTUALLY cures diseases...

    As for science and nature "working in tandem"... the deep, abiding ignorance of science that comment displays is mindboggling. Science is a methodology which allows us to understand the natural world. It is quite impossible for the two to be antithetical.
  3. (10 Nov '09) Pot Breaker says,
    What would homeopaths prescribe to those "affected" with pregnancy... OH YEAH!
  4. (20 Nov '09) Nonlocal says,
    For the record, NCCAM still dismisses a majority of quack science claims. Simultaneously, it's also a decent resource on some nutritional supplements. They do receive funding to conduct double blind studies, and their white papers are free to read when they have them available.

    Oh, and "your mother", homeopathy IS b.s. When you say "natural", you probably mean "herbal", which does work effectively in some cases. SOME CASES, mind you. A lot of it's probably just crap.

    Furthermore, FDA regulation doesn't prove effective on EVERY pharmaceutical out there. How many lawsuits have people won because of fatalities caused by unintended side-effects of prescription medication? But, that doesn't discount that Zicam is b.s. also. I'm just saying that FDA regulation DOES NOT guarantee a safe product.
  5. (20 Nov '09) fsj says,
    Something is old, which means its good, right?? Even if they had no understanding of what they were doing and have never had proof of effectiveness, right??

    I just love seeing the word "nature" abused as if something being "natural" means it is the best possible option, despite the often arbitrary distinction between what is natural and what is not.

Add a comment!


Name/SN: (Required)
Website: (Optional)
Email: (Required—so we can ask to reprint your comment)

(Privacy policy: We won't publish your email address or send you any spam. Ever.)